As
a follower of my blog, you've likely read about the SONAR Content Distribution
Model and how it uses quality, original content through strategic,
synchronized and targeted distribution on organic online channels.
Readers
of my ezine as well as my book, Content Is Cash, often email me
questions about 'SONAR marketing' and I thought it would be helpful to
publish these real-life questions, as it may be something that was on
your mind.
So here goes...
Q:
Do I have repurpose the original content every time I add it to a new
SONAR site or do it only by individual SONAR categories?
A:
Yes. Your original 'catalyst content' should be the source content that
goes to your in-house audience first (i.e. blog, email), then you
should take that source and repurpose and reuse it -- adapting it
accordingly -- to each SONAR site you disseminate it to as well as for
each target audience within those select SONAR site. SONAR's key is
using quality, original, content that is useful, valuable, and
actionable. For each site/audience, you can repurpose it in many ways:
--add new sentences, remove sentences
--add/change headlines, subheadings and intro copy
--change closing paragraph/call to action
--modify bullets, mix them up, or add/delete to existing ones
A
press release of your repurposed version is a completely different
format as the original source. It's written in third person and using
quotes. It also should have a headline that is newsworthy and gets
readers attention quickly. This version is different from a version that
is, let's say, used in article marketing (article) or in social
networking sites (content blurbs) -- yet all of these uses originated
from the same source.
Q:
If I have two Social media bookmarking sites, like Digg and Reddit, do I
have to repurpose the article for each site or use the same content for
the SONAR Social Media Bookmarking sites?
A:
Yes, but it doesn't have to be heavy edits. You may change headline and
add/remove sentences or paragraphs based on each audience and headline
being used. It needs to be relevant and make sense to your target
reader. That's what makes SONAR unique -- it's targeted and relevant --
it also leverages high quality content and is uploaded to synergistic
website's where that audience would find it relevant.
Q:
Wouldn't Google pick up that the back-link found in each repurposed
articles as the same link as the original content and declare them the
same?
Read
my blogposts (below) on what is duplicate content and what isn't. If
you target the content for each audience and repurpose it -- as long as
it's quality content, relevant to each site and audience, and are on
different domains -- it's not duplicate content or spam. Your press
release is targeted for one audience type; and your article marketing or
social marketing blurb is targeted to another audience. Google's
updates like Farmer, Panda and Penguin are targeting sites that use
irrelevant links, poor quality content and that are spammy.
SONAR's uses are relevant to each audience/site it's on. It's not the
same article over and over again, it's repurposed and modified. It's
also not on the same domain -- it's all over the web in targeted
locations that you're hand selecting.
I
like to mix up back-links as well. So some repurposed versions may link
back to your source content. For example, your online press release may
link back to the press release on your website or blog in the 'Press'
or 'Media' section of your website; I also put in two other links in my
press releases (in the About Us section, including social media account
and free ezine sign up page -- for lead gen purposes). Your article
(full or excerpt) may link back to the original article in your
'Newsletter archives' section. Your social media blurbs may link to
'Newsletter article', home page', or 'ezine sign up page', and so on.
Your links should be strategically chosen based on your call to action
Extra reading:
http://www.musclemarketing.blogspot.com/2012_05_06_archive.html
1 comment:
Wow! This is really great news!
Post a Comment